How I Turned Volatility into Profit with SMCX Put Options (And What I Learned Along the Way)

 

I. A Trader's Log: Setting the Scene – More Than Just Numbers

Welcome, fellow traders and market enthusiasts! If you've been in the options trading game for any length of time, you know it's a world that blends sharp strategy with nerve-wracking uncertainty, often leading to moments of surprising reward. But beyond the charts, the Greeks, and the financial jargon, trading is a profoundly human experience. It tests our discipline, our patience, and our ability to manage those ever-present emotions.

Today, I want to pull back the curtain on a recent series of trades I made. My goal isn't to parade a win – we all know the market can humble us in a heartbeat – but to share the thought process, the anxieties, the key decisions, and ultimately, the valuable lessons that emerged. This isn't just about the profit; it's about the journey and what we can glean from it.

One of the most crucial aspects of trading, and one that often gets glossed over in purely technical discussions, is the psychological dimension. We're not robots; fear, greed, hope, and impatience are all part of the package. Acknowledging these emotions, understanding how they can influence our decisions – for better or worse – is a cornerstone of growing as a trader. So, this story will delve into not just the "what" and "how" of these trades, but also the "how it felt."  

There's a unique power in sharing specific trading narratives, complete with their emotional and psychological backdrop. It transforms abstract concepts and strategies into something tangible and relatable. When we hear about others' experiences, including their internal monologue and decision-making under pressure, it can make the learning process far more engaging and memorable than simply reading a textbook. So, consider this a page from my personal trading log, offered in the spirit of shared learning.  

II. The Trades Unpacked: My Foray into Selling SMCX Puts

In early May 2025, my attention was drawn to an Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) ticker symbol SMCX. After some analysis, I decided to sell some put options on it. For those who like to see the raw numbers, here’s a quick summary of how those trades played out:

Date	Symbol	Option Type	Strike Price	Expiration	Contracts	Entry Price	Exit Price	Profit/Loss	Status
5/2/2025	SMCX	PUT	26	5/16/2025	1	340	240	100	Closed
5/5/2025	SMCX	PUT	25	6/20/2025	1	540	195	345	Closed
5/2/2025	SMCX	PUT	27	6/20/2025	1	600	180	420	Closed

Now, let's decode what's happening here. When I "sell a put option," I'm essentially taking on the obligation to buy 100 shares of the underlying asset (in this case, SMCX) at a specific price (the "Strike Price") if the option is exercised by the buyer, on or before a specific date (the "Expiration"). For taking on this obligation, I receive a payment upfront, known as a premium. In the table, the "Entry Price" represents the premium I collected for each contract (e.g., $340 for the first trade, as option premiums are typically quoted per share, so $3.40 x 100 shares). The "Exit Price" is what I later paid to buy back that same option to close my position (e.g., $240 for the first trade). The difference, in this case, was my profit.

By selling these puts, I was essentially making a bet that SMCX would stay above the respective strike prices ($26, $25, and $27) through the life of the option, or at least until I decided to close the position. Alternatively, it can mean I'd be comfortable owning shares at those strike prices if the options were exercised, with the premium received effectively lowering my cost basis. You might think of it like an insurance company collecting a premium for a policy; if the "insured event" (the stock price falling sharply below the strike) doesn't occur, or if I can "cancel the policy" (buy back the option) for less than I sold it for, I pocket the difference. Interestingly, even renowned investors like Warren Buffett have historically used strategies like selling cash-secured puts to either generate income or acquire stocks at a desired lower price.  

It's also important to understand where the profit in these trades came from. It wasn't solely because SMCX's price behaved favorably relative to my strike prices. Since I closed the positions before their expiration dates, a significant portion of the profit also came from the effects of time decay (known in options lingo as "theta") and, as we'll see, likely a decrease in implied volatility (a "vega crush") once positive news hit the underlying stock. Options are wasting assets; all else being equal, their value erodes as they get closer to expiration, which benefits option sellers. Furthermore, a sharp positive move in the underlying stock, coupled with reduced uncertainty, can cause the implied volatility of put options to decrease, making them cheaper to buy back.

III. The "Why": My Rationale for Targeting SMCX Puts in Early May 2025

To understand my reasoning, we first need to look at what SMCX actually is, and its relationship to another stock, SMCI.

SMCX is the ticker for the "Defiance Daily Target 2X Long SMCI ETF". The key here is "2X Long SMCI." This means it's a leveraged ETF designed to deliver, before fees and expenses, two times (200%) the daily percentage change in the share price of Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI). If SMCI goes up 1% on a given day, SMCX aims to go up 2%; if SMCI drops 1%, SMCX aims to drop 2%. Super Micro Computer Inc. (SMCI) itself is a company prominent in the server technology space, recognized as a significant player in "AI-optimized infrastructure". The tech sector, and AI in particular, can be quite dynamic, influencing SMCI's volatility and, by extension, that of SMCX.  

A crucial point about leveraged ETFs like SMCX: they are complex financial instruments. They come with unique risks, such as the potential for performance to deviate from the expected 2x return over periods longer than a single day due to compounding effects, and they exhibit heightened volatility. These products are generally intended for knowledgeable investors who understand these risks and are prepared to actively monitor their positions. This isn't your set-it-and-forget-it type of investment.  

Now, let's rewind to my market outlook in early May 2025, before any major news broke. Looking at SMCI's stock chart around that time, it had experienced a pullback from its earlier highs. For instance, on May 1st, 2025, when I initiated two of the trades, SMCI closed around $33.71, and on May 5th, when I entered the third trade, it was around $32.17. This was down from levels in the $36-$37 range in late April and significantly higher prices earlier in the year. The SMCX ETF itself had a previous close of $25.75 on May 1st. The put options I sold, with strike prices of $27, $26, and $25, were therefore at-the-money or slightly out-of-the-money at the time of initiation.  

My thesis for selling these puts was based on a few observations and expectations. I viewed the recent pullback in SMCI as a potential consolidation phase. My assessment was that SMCI (and therefore SMCX, with its 2x leverage) was unlikely to fall significantly further in the short term covered by my option expirations, and might even be poised for a bit of a recovery. Furthermore, leveraged ETFs, and stocks that have seen recent price choppiness, often carry higher implied volatility. Higher implied volatility translates into richer premiums for option sellers. If my directional assumption (neutral to mildly bullish) was correct, collecting these inflated premiums seemed like an attractive proposition.

Selling puts on a recently declined, inherently volatile, leveraged asset like SMCX was certainly a calculated risk. This strategy implied a belief that either the downward momentum had paused and major further declines were unlikely in the near term, or that the premium collected offered adequate compensation for the risk of being wrong. It also suggested that I had a plan to manage the position if the market moved against me. The subsequent news that propelled the stock higher was a welcome, and very profitable, development, but the initial decision was rooted in an analysis of the existing price action and volatility landscape.

IV. Navigating the Trade: The Emotional Rollercoaster and Key Decisions

Once the trades were on, the "waiting game" began, intertwined with the usual emotional undercurrents that accompany live positions. After entering the trades, there's always that mix of confidence in your analysis and a touch of nervousness, especially with a leveraged product like SMCX, where moves can be amplified.  

The period from May 5th through May 12th was relatively uneventful for the underlying stock, SMCI. Its price hovered, closing at $32.17 on May 5th, drifting to $31.99 by May 9th, and then showing a bit of strength to close at $33.52 on May 12th. SMCX, the leveraged ETF, would have mirrored these relatively modest moves, albeit with twice the percentage change. On May 12th, SMCX closed at $26.50 , not dramatically different from its early May levels.  

During this phase, the value of my sold puts would have fluctuated. While time decay (theta) was quietly working in my favor, chipping away at the option premiums each day, any dip in SMCI's price would have caused a temporary increase in the puts' value (a negative for me as a seller). This period underscored the need for patience and adherence to the original trading plan. It's easy to get spooked by minor adverse movements, but conviction in your initial analysis (and proper position sizing) helps weather these smaller storms. Active monitoring is particularly crucial for leveraged products. I was checking the positions regularly, keeping an eye on SMCI's price action and having mental (and sometimes hard) "uh-oh" levels where I might reconsider or adjust the strategy.  

Then came the game-changer: Tuesday, May 13th, 2025. News hit the wires that Super Micro Computer (SMCI) stock was experiencing a significant rally. The primary catalyst was a bullish initiation of coverage from analysts at Raymond James, who gave SMCI an "outperform" rating and a $41 price target. They cited the company as having "emerged as a market leader in AI-optimized infrastructure". This positive sentiment sent SMCI shares soaring by about 16% on that day.  

Naturally, with SMCI making such a strong upward move, its 2X leveraged counterpart, SMCX, had an even more spectacular day. SMCX rocketed up by approximately 31.85%, climbing from a previous close of $26.50 to finish the day at $34.94. This was the unexpected (or perhaps, more accurately, the hoped-for but not explicitly predicted) catalyst that dramatically accelerated the profitability of my put positions.  

When SMCX surged like that, the value of the put options I had sold plummeted – which is precisely what an option seller wants to see. The puts, which represented the right to sell SMCX at $27, $26, and $25, became far less valuable as SMCX itself was now trading well above those levels. My trade log shows I closed all three positions on that day, realizing the profits of $100, $345, and $420.

My thought process for closing was straightforward. The profits were substantial and had materialized much faster than I would typically anticipate, thanks almost entirely to this news catalyst. The old trading adage, "Pigs get fat, hogs get slaughtered," came to mind. With leveraged ETFs, impressive gains can vanish just as quickly if the underlying stock reverses course. Securing the windfall felt like the prudent and disciplined move rather than trying to squeeze out every last penny by holding until expiration and risking a pullback.  

This whole sequence beautifully illustrates the interplay between initial analysis, the impact of unforeseen news, and the emotional discipline required in trading. My initial decision to sell the puts was based on my read of the price action and volatility environment. However, the outsized success and rapid conclusion of the trades were heavily influenced by an external news event. It's a reminder that even with the best analysis, the market can throw curveballs – sometimes they are wonderfully profitable ones! The ability to then act decisively, take profits when a significant target is hit (or a windfall occurs), and not let greed cloud judgment is a critical skill for any trader.  

V. From Experience to Insight: Lessons Forged in the Market's Fire

Every trade, win or lose, carries lessons. These particular SMCX trades were no exception, offering several key takeaways:

• Leveraged ETFs are Potent but Perilous: The 2X leverage on SMCX certainly amplified the gains in this instance, turning a good underlying stock move into a fantastic ETF move. However, it's absolutely critical to remember that this leverage is a double-edged sword. A similar adverse move in SMCI would have resulted in amplified losses on SMCX. This experience reinforced the need for extreme caution, careful position sizing, and diligent, active management when dealing with such instruments. They are not for the faint of heart or the inattentive trader.  

• The Power of Selling Premium (When Timed Right): These trades highlighted the benefits of being an option seller. I was positioned to profit not only if the stock price stayed above my chosen strikes but also from the passage of time (theta decay) and, in this specific case, a significant drop in implied volatility (vega crush) that occurred once the positive news hit and uncertainty presumably lessened.

• Catalysts Can Be Game-Changers: The Raymond James upgrade for SMCI was the pivotal event that supercharged these trades. While I didn't (and couldn't) predict that specific piece of news, being positioned in a way that could benefit from general upside (or at least the absence of significant downside) allowed me to capitalize on it. It’s a stark reminder that unexpected news flow can often override purely technical setups or short-term sentiment.  

• The Importance of an Exit Strategy: Knowing when to take profits is just as crucial, if not more so, than knowing when to enter a trade. The temptation might have been to hold on, hoping for even more gains. However, closing the trades after such a sharp, favorable move locked in the profits and eliminated the risk of a sudden reversal, which is always a concern with volatile, leveraged products. This decision was about banking a significant win that exceeded initial expectations, rather than succumbing to greed.  

Beyond these trade-specific learnings, the experience also offered broader reflections on my trading practice and psychology:

• Trading Psychology is Key: This series of trades was a mini-masterclass in managing emotions. There was the need for patience during the initial, relatively flat period before the news broke. Then, decisiveness was required to act quickly and take profits when the opportunity presented itself. It's easy to imagine the "Fear of Missing Out" (FOMO) if I hadn't taken those profits and the price continued to run, or conversely, the "Greed" that might have whispered to hold on for just a little bit more, potentially risking a give-back of those gains.  

• The Value of a Trading Journal (Even an Informal One): The very process of preparing this blog post – thinking through the trades, the rationale, the execution, the emotional responses, and the lessons – is a form of journaling. This kind of reflective practice is invaluable. It helps to solidify what went right and why, what could perhaps have been done differently (even in a winning scenario), and to internalize the lessons learned for future application. It’s how we identify our strengths and weaknesses, avoid repeating mistakes, and reinforce good habits.  

Indeed, the act of consistently reflecting on one's trades fosters a powerful compounding effect on trading skill. Each trade, when reviewed with honesty and an eye for lessons, provides data points not just about the market's behavior, but about our own behavior as traders. Recognizing our emotional responses, our decision-making biases, and our adherence (or lack thereof) to our strategy allows for an iterative process of improvement. This self-correction loop, fueled by reflection, is far more crucial for long-term development and success as a trader than the outcome of any single winning or losing trade.

VI. The Journey Continues: Every Trade a Teacher

While these SMCX put trades worked out quite well, it's always important to approach the market with a healthy dose of humility. The market is a dynamic, complex, and often unpredictable teacher. One series of profitable trades, however satisfying, doesn't grant immunity from future losses or mean one has "figured it all out". Overconfidence can be a trader's undoing.  

I also want to reiterate that options trading, and particularly trading leveraged instruments like SMCX, carries significant risks. This account is a narrative of my personal experience and my thought processes; it is not financial advice, nor is it a universal blueprint for trading these or any other instruments. What worked in this specific instance, under these specific market conditions, with this specific underlying, might not work at other times or for other traders.  

My hope in sharing this story is to encourage you to approach your own trading as a journey of continuous learning and self-discovery. Consider keeping a trading journal, even a simple one. Reflect on your decisions – the good, the bad, and the ugly. Strive to understand your own trading psychology, your biases, and your emotional triggers.  

The path of a trader is more akin to a marathon than a sprint. There will be ups and downs, exhilarating wins, and frustrating losses. The key is to stay disciplined, manage risk effectively, learn from every experience, and continually refine your approach. By focusing on the process, embracing the human element of trading, and committing to ongoing learning, we can navigate the market's chop with greater skill and resilience.

Wishing you clarity, discipline, and success on your own trading paths.